Top Ten Trends in the Pre-employment Background Screening Industry for 2009

Employment Screening Resources (ESR),denying employment without considering whether
a leading national employment screeningthere is a business justification for disqualification
background firm, released its "Second Annual Topbased upon the crime and the job. This will
Ten Trends in the Pre-Employment Backgroundcontinue to be a developing area in 2009. One
Screening Industry" for 2009 today. Althoughexample are the new laws passed by the State
issues from 2008 remain on the list, the 2009of New York that become effective this year
trends reflect increasing concerns over the usethat place a greater emphasis on employers
of Facebook and similar sites, lawsuits loominganalyzing a past criminal record to determine
over inaccurate Background Screening reports,whether there is a business justification not to
increasing government scrutiny of the screeninghire a person. The New York law also requires
industry and privacy and security issues.that notice of various rights be provided to job
"In the current legal environment, businesses wantapplicants (See an explanation of the New York
to make sure they are not only exercising duelaws in the December, 2008 ESR Newsletter.
diligence but are also ahead of the curve on legal4.  Consumer Protection Litigation: As the
issues," said Lester S. Rosen, attorney at law andscreening industry matures, and applicants and
founder of ESR and author of two books ontheir lawyers become much more informed about
background screening. "The quickest way to gettheir consumer rights, it is likely that there will be
sued is to not understand the legal environmentan increase in litigation. The may include class
and latest trends surrounding background checksaction lawsuits against screening firms, particularly
and employment."when it comes to various notices required under
Rosen believes that the federal and statethe federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, and
governments will require more backgroundaccuracy requirements in the federal law. Since
screening in 2009, especially in sensitive jobs, anddatabase searches can result in false negatives
that more businesses will make Pre-Employment(meaning a criminal is missed) as well as false
Background Screening a requirement for the job.positives (meaning an innocent person is labeled a
The increased use of Applicant Tracking Systemscriminal), it is probable that employers and
will lead to "one button" clicks for backgroundscreening firms that rely upon databases may be
checks, he says.the subject of litigation where a database search
"At the same time, consumers are worried aboutfailed to locate a dangerous person.
their privacy. That’s why data protection and5.  Impact of the recession: As a result of the
accuracy have become so critical. The use ofrecession and higher unemployment, it is likely that
social networking sites like Facebook and MySpaceemployers will need to scrutinize applications even
are another minefield for employers," says Rosen.more carefully, to be on the watch for fraudulent
"We have identified 10 Trends to help alertcredentials, such as inflated or fictional
employers on what to expect in 2009."employment history or educational degrees.
Hot topics for 2009 include tighter governmentAnother recession related trend may be the
regulation, privacy concerns, and controversyincrease in applicants who are willing to perform
over sending sensitive data offshore fortheir own background checks in order to present
processing, increasing demand for accurateto employers a self-certification that their
criminal record reporting, and the probability ofcredentials are for real. Since more temporary
more lawsuits against both employers andemployees and Independent Contractors are hired
background screening firms. Not that the 2008during a recession, the issue of screening
trends outlined in January 2008 are no longernon-employees will continue to be important.
relevant, but a shifting world has reshuffled the6.  Data security and data breaches and
challenges facing employers, job applicants andOffshoring Data: Since identity theft continues to
screening firms.be a national and international problem, expect
1.  More Government Regulation: Likely toeven more emphasis in 2009 on data security and
increase in 2009 are the requirements by federalprotection. Closely related is the continuing issue
and state governments for more backgroundof employers and screening firms offshoring
checks in sensitive industries – such as childconsumer data to India or other similar places for
care workers and certain health workers. Anothercost savings. Once data leaves the United States.,
area where the government requires checks isit is beyond U.S. privacy protections. A new
verification of the eligibility of a new hire to workorganization called Concerned CRA’s has
by using the E-verify program. Although litigationtaken a stance against offshoring such data
has been filed, the announced rules requirewithout notification to consumers. The use of
employers with certain federal governmenthome-operator networks also presents an
contracts to utilize the E-verily program starting inunnecessary risk to privacy as well. There is no
2009. Along with the federal government, thejustification for personal information to be spread
states are becoming increasingly involved inacross kitchen tables and dorm rooms across
regulating screening.America.
2.  Privacy and Accuracy: The subjects of7.  Accreditation by the NAPBS: The non-profit
privacy, accuracy, and fairness will also be majortrade organization for the screening Industry, the
issues for 2009. Privacy Times newsletter, forNational Association of Professional Background
example, led off its December 2008 issue with anScreeners has announced the introduction of an
article criticizing the screening industry. The letteraccreditation program. NAPBS has gone through
noted that a coalition of legal aid groups has calledan exhaustive process to develop “Best
on the Federal Trade Commission to takePractices” for the industry, and it is anticipated
enforcement actions against background screeningthat firms will start going through the process this
companies for “widespread noncomplianceyear.
with the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s8.  Social network sites: The use of social
requirements for accuracy and disputenetworking sites as a pre-employment screening
investigations.”device will continue to be a hot topic in 2009, as
The report was especially critical of the use ofmore recruiters and HR professionals go online to
criminal databases that can falsely accuse ansatisfy their curiosity about candidates. The
innocent person of being a criminal, and the failureproblem: contrary to popular belief, just because it
of some screening firms “to take into accountis online does not mean that it’s a good idea
the fact that criminal identity theft is unfairlyto utilize it without developing policies and
tarring thousands of job applicants.” A leadingprocedures. Online material can be inaccurate,
cause of inaccuracies is matching innocent jobdiscriminatory, and under certain circumstances, its
applicants to criminal records based upon theuse can be an invasion of privacy. Stay tuned as
same or similar name in a database, withoutmore courts give their opinions on this issue.
re-verification of the record at the courthouse. A9.  Integration of services: With the advent of
new organization called Concerned CRA’s has“Web 2.0,” it is likely that technology will
taken a stance against utilizing such databasesplay an even bigger role in the coming years.
without taking proper measures to ensureSeamless integrations with Applicant Tracking
accuracy of criminal records.Systems allow paperless background screening
3.  Second chance for ex-offenders: Unless as asystems at the click of a mouse.
society, we want to build more prisons than10.  International background checks: In 2008, we
schools or hospitals, something must be done toobserved that, “With mobility of workers
reduce recidivism and find employment foracross international borders, due diligence is no
applicants with criminal records. At the same time,longer limited to just what an applicant has done in
placing the wrong person in the wrong job can bethe United States. Although there are numerous
a disaster and cause untold grief. As a result ofpractical and legal challenges as well as data and
Title VII and notice from the EEOC, employersprivacy concerns, international background checks
are well advised to review their hiring practices toare becoming very accessible to employers.”
ensure that they are not discriminating againstThat will continue to be the trend in 2009 as well.
members of protected classes by automatically