The Hidden Costs of Patent Docketing Software

Unfortunately, a number of patent docketingthan the application purchase price.
software vendors do not always reveal theUnderstanding the cost of patent docketing
overall cost of ownership required to deploy theirsoftware means tracking all related expenditures
systems and it is only after the product isacross its life cycle: purchase/lease,
purchased that complications related toimplementation, training, support, maintenance and
configuration, data migration, integration andall subsequent upgrades. It is simpler said than
training become clear. So begins the spiral into thedone.
hidden-cost trap.For many patent departments, the patent
The patent department needs to have andocketing software implementation is the first
analytical, result-oriented thought process whentime they have been involved in a software
evaluating patent docketing services and softwareproject, and therefore are sometimes not aware
to support intellectual property (IP) managementof these challenges.
functions. However, even the savviestPatent Docketing Software implementation
professionals are often misguided by the low-costprojects tend to have many hidden costs that
appeal of software packages and too frequentlyyou need to ensure are captured as part of you
fall victim to the high upkeep and maintenancebusiness case, and managed during the project.
costs of these types of tools.Example hidden costs are:
Before you know it, the "lowest cost" docketing* Lost of productivity during implementation, such
vendor that promised the world to you, is nowas re-training
costing hundreds of thousands more in* Lost of productivity through poor user support
deployment. Now, you will be told that your data* Opportunity cost of management
migration did not work, because you have bad* Pilot costs
data and you need to get your team attend their* Internal resources working on the project
5 day training program, adding huge "opportunity* Internal marketing costs
costs" and losing hundreds of hours of* Change management
productivity.* Data conversion/Data cleansing costs
What's more, these docketing tools are not* Tech-savvyness
flexible, and hard to configure causing frustration* User support both technical and business issues
among your users and aggravate the already bad* Ongoing software and hardware maintenance
situation of excessive costs and wasted time.Nailing down all of these costs will be difficult and
The U.S. Department of Commerce study showssometimes impossible prior to procurement.
that software purchase expenditures account forHowever, making the effort to identify and
only approximately 30 percent of the total. Theestimate as many other hidden costs will be well
biggest hidden cost is represented by laborworth the exercise. Besides, no one likes iceberg
expenditures ranging from 37 percent for supportsurprises or hidden supplier hooks after the
and 33 percent related to software getting thepurchasing decision.
software up and running. The numbers translateLecorpio has an excellent track record of
to a ratio of 1:2, software license to managementsuccessful patent docketing software project
labor costs; and 1:1 license fee to implementation.implementations. Lecorpio's professional services
IDC recently reported that "Many companiesuse a powerful combination of strategic insight
underestimate the cost of managing applications.and superior execution to optimize the cost and
When you consider the annual costs ofefficiency of our client's IP operations. Feel free to
administering the applications and the cost ofcontact us to get more information on best
managing issues around performance, changespractices for Intellectual asset management
and availability, it is most likely significantly greaterproject implementation.