Product Data Standards

-- End Ad Box --->the bottom line?
There is an increasing disconnect between theAs an example, let's say the company is a
way many of us live, work and communicate onmanufacturer. It saves 1% through accurate data,
a day-to-day basis and the way business isaccording to the white paper, and an additional
conducted.5% by getting its information to the market in a
Without proper product tracking and inventorytimely manner, according to Mr. Silverii's estimates.
procedures, even a computerized counterIf the company's sales are as little as $5 million
operation may not alert the counter person that aper year, its savings through data clean-up is
product is on his store's shelves. The loss in sales$300,000 each and every year. It might cost all
resulting from bad data and lag time in delivery ofof that gain in the first year and, of course, the
that data to the parts counter has beencosts are front-loaded, but think of the benefits
estimated at $6.7 billion each year.of being able to send a data file to anyone in
It may be surprising to the techno-hip-those whoseconds and sending updates within minutes of
carry Blackberries and cell phones and usehaving a new product released. If our $300,000
broadband connections in the office and atfigure turns out to be reasonably accurate, the
home-that many businesses today are still sendingcompany's next project is to estimate the cost
and receiving order information via fax andof cleaning up its data.
telephone. A typical order process might consistLet's look at some of the issues that might affect
of someone faxing a purchase order to athat cost. Fortunately, when Dana and O'Reilly
manufacturer or WD and receiving a fax back (ifwent through this process recently, they published
the buyer is lucky) to confirm the order anda white paper that outlines the tasks and pitfalls in
shipping date. If things aren't quite right with bardata clean-up. The 94-page document is called the
codes, part numbers, quantities or packaging, this"Technology Enhanced Standards-Based Trading
electronic conversation devolves into a game ofReport," which is freely available for download at
phone tag to address the discrepancies. Sound(If you are still awake when you have finished
familiar?reading it, you are an obvious candidate for PIES
Once the discrepancies are handled, the supplier orcompliance.)
manufacturer enters the information by hand intoHere are a few points to be considered in the
the ordering system software. The order is thendata-cleanup process, which may impact a
packed and shipped. The problem is that thecompany's decision. The first two are quotes
wasted time it takes to deal with discrepancies infrom the TEST Report.
the ordering process (not to mention data-entry-"Central among the findings of the TEST team
errors) costs the business's a staggering amountwas that cultural issues, not technological issues,
of money.were the greatest impediments to effective
In a white paper authored by the Automotiveimplementation of standards-based trading. It
Aftermarket Industry Associ-ation (AAIA),seemed that more time had to be spent selling
Aftermarket Council on Electronic Commercethe idea of adopting standards than on the actual
(ACEC) and Profile Systems (now Comergent),compliance with them."
called "The Cost of Unsynchronized Product and-"Probably the most obvious finding of the TEST
Pricing Data," annual losses to the industry weregroup is the amount of redundant functions that
estimated to be $1.7 billion per year. Thisexist between the manufacturer and the reseller
represents a loss of 1% of sales for the averagein the area of data management. Reduction or
manufacturer and .75% for the average reseller,elimination of those redundancies will lead to
according to the report.substantial savings. Additionally, enhancements to
The Data Audit Certification (DAC) program isexisting programs and significant new opportunities
designed to test a product database forare facilitated by the existence of accurate and
compliance with the Product Informationsynchronized product data. These include category
Exchange Standards (PIES). Current DACmanagement, collaborative forecasting, Internet
participants include Dana, Arvin, ASC, Cardone,parts ordering and automated replenishment."
Global Accessories, Melling and NGK. Information-The TEST Report also points out that the data
on the program is available at Pies/Pies_DAC.asp.necessary to comply with the 82 minimum PIES
In addition, there is another multi-billion-dollar lossfields necessary for compliance may live on
related to the time lag in data reaching the partsdifferent servers in different geographical
counter. Marlen Silverii from Arvin Meritor made alocations, even running different operating
presentation at an industry forum last year insystems. Think in terms of packaging information
which he quantified the dollar value of the problem(size, shape, weight) residing on servers at your
on the strut business. Silverii pegged annualpackaging contractor, product specifications
industry-wide lost sales resulting from just aresiding on servers in the engineering department
six-month lag in data to be $33 million at retail. Ifand product information related to sales residing
you assume that struts account for as much ason servers in marketing. All of this data needs to
5% of total retail aftermarket sales, you projectbe located, updated and normalized, and
more than $5 billion in lost sales annually, directlyconnections have to be built between the various
attributable to slow distribution of catalog data.servers and the PIES database for ongoing
Bob Moore of Bob Moore and Partners, a topupdates. The TEST Report calls this "a formidable
industry analyst, tells the story of trying to buytask."
an oil filter for his 2004 Mini Cooper at the localIn July 2004, The Alliance, O'Reilly, Advance, CSK
parts counter. The counterman told him thatand Autozone sent out letters encouraging their
there was no application data for his 2004 in thesuppliers to become PIES compliant and DAC
computer. Bob then called his friends at a majorcertified. Here is an excerpt from that letter: "...we
filter manufacturer and discovered that the partwant to join our suppliers in initiatives that drive
number for the 2003 car was the same as thedown our respective costs of doing business. We
part number for the 2004, and he also discoveredwant to eliminate the barrier that bad product
that the part for his car was on the shelf at thedata poses and make progress towards a goal of
parts store that he visited. The part was on theend-to-end product data synchronization in the
shelf, but it couldn't be sold due to lag time in dataaftermarket.
delivery."Because the data for the products we sell begins
As we all know, when either the mechanic or thewith you, we ask that the first steps towards
consumer visits the parts counter and the part iscleansing and certifying your data be made by
not available, the dealer is the next stop andyou. AAIA has announced an industry service
perhaps the first stop on the next occasion. Thecalled Data Audit and Certification (DAC). This
dealer has accurate data, and the correct partsservice will allow you to identify any deficiencies in
are often in stock.your product information, correct them and earn
In the performance and accessories side of thean annual certification status for PIES.
aftermarket, we have another factor that"(We are) convinced that suppliers who are PIES
compounds the potential loss. According to SEMACertified will experience fewer errors on
research reports, new truck buyers, for example,processing PO's, will enjoy faster time-to-market
accessorize their vehicles within three months offor new product introductions and will experience
purchase and spend an average of $1,500 onlower returns due to errors in order and shipping
those accessories. Consumers who don't find thequantities."
accessories they want might wander down theDana and O'Reilly published a white paper that
street and spend that money on a new Palm Pilot,outlines the tasks and pitfalls in data clean-up. The
barbecue or set of golf clubs, and that94-page document, "Technology Enhanced
performance or accessory sale may be lost toStandards-Based Trading Report," is available for
the aftermarket forever.download at
Thus, we have an industry loss of somewhere inHere is one more quote from Mike Williams at
the neighborhood of $6.7 billion each year due toO'Reilly, who led his company in preparing to
two issues: bad data and lag time in delivery ofreceive data from Dana in the TEST program: "If
that data to the parts counter.a manufacturer is not currently doing business
What To Do and Howwith O'Reilly, that manufacturer will have a distinct
In the early '90s, a group of industry participantsmarket advantage with O'Reilly if their product
from AAIA, SEMA, the Motor and Equipmentinformation is PIES compliant and DAC certified."
Manufacturers Association (MEMA), HDeXchangeSo, to be realistic, there is a problem...and an
(HDX), Profile Systems and a number of otheropportunity. A company may spend what will
aftermarket trade associations and companiesprobably be some serious resources in the near
formed the ACEC. Its goal was to create industryterm to increase its margins and increase its
standards for the description of automotivecompetitive advantage for the foreseeable future
aftermarket parts data and for vehicle descriptionor wait until it is forced to do so by its trading
standards. The industry's top minds have beenpartners.
meeting ever since to hash out issues related toThe good news is that companies don't have to
data standards and to ensure that these datago it alone. There are a number of sources of
standards are compatible with those of the OEMssupport within the industry for assistance. Check
and other industries. The outcome of theseout ACEConline.org for information related to the
meetings was the creation of the Productindustry standards, PIES and ACES. Comergent
Information Exchange Standards (PIES) and thewas responsible for assisting Dana with data
extension of the AAIA vehicle description tablessourcing and normalization for its PIES project.
into an accurate set of descriptions now knownThere are a number of other industry data
as the AAIA Catalog Enhanced Standard (ACES).mapping companies available to assist you with
ACES was launched in 2003 and is continuallyPIES-compliant data mapping. These companies
under industry review and enhancement. Ininclude DCi, Quantum Data Services, JNP Soft,
addition, AAIA recently completed an agreementand GCommerce to name a few. Both SEMA and
with Comergent to create a Data AuditAAIA have information on their websites and will
Certification (DAC) program. This program isbe hosting Webinars and seminars addressing
designed to test a product database forthese issues. The University of the Aftermarket
compliance with the PIES standard. Current DACis holding a two-day seminar on Industry
participants include Dana, Arvin, ASC, Cardone,Standards for Aftermarket Data. Those
Global Accessories, Melling and NGK.interested should sign up early for the March
Consumers who don't find the auto accessoriessession, which will be hosted by Denso on March
they want at their local speed shop or parts store13 and 14 in Long Beach, CA. According to the
might wander down the street and spend thatwebsite at "This comprehensive program gives
money on computer gear, housewares orparticipants the training necessary to successfully
sporting goods, and that performance orimplement AAIA's new enhanced e-CAT Standard
accessory sale may be lost to the aftermarketon Day One and PIES (Product Information
forever.Exchange Standard) on Day Two."
So all a business has to do is get its data straightOnce manufacturers have their data in
and in PIES-compatible format, then take the nextstandardized format and that formatting is
step and have it certified as compliant. Simple,certified through DAC, there is the possibility of
right? You may be in for a surprise. The reasonstoring all of that data in a single Industry Data
we recommend the additional step of certificationWarehouse where it can then be accessed by
is that it is really a way to find and fix errors thatparticipants in the industry who have the approval
a company might otherwise miss. No one in theof the manufacturer for that access. The purpose
certification process so far has passed on theof this centralized data bank would be to provide
first run.an efficient model to make rich, standardized data
Let's look at how a company might takeavailable to the broadest possible constituency of
advantage of these standards to increase itsaftermarket practitioners at the lowest possible
profits. We can look at bad data as a cost (thecost. Is this an idea whose time has come? There
glass is half empty) or look at data cleansing as aare a number of industry leaders who think so.
way to increase profits (the glass is half full). WhoKeep your ears to the ground on this one.
among us couldn't benefit from a 6% increase in