Liberty Against Right to Privacy

Among the talked about issues on democracyimportant to get the right ones." An employer has
involve basic grantable rights such as free speechall the right to check on the applicants but they
and right to privacy. Freedom of expression asare bounded by rules set by every state and by
clearly emphasized in the constitution is but athe federal government. An employer can check
cardinal thread of tenet that no one shouldon the history of an applicant but only with his or
misinterpret in any way. So does right to privacyher consent or else said process cannot be used
is a guaranteed liberty right stated in theas basis to determine his or her application's result.
constitution that, just the same, cannot beAn instance happened wherein an employer used
violated. However, all freedom that is embodied ina police report to verify the credibility of the
the constitution cannot be absolute as it is alwaysapplicant for his company. The police report
partnered with responsibility. Thus the issue ofgenerated two allegations of a minor crime and
crimes and lawlessness come in. In the event thatsome arrests of alleged driving incompetency. All
a person overly exercised his claimed freedom tothe records that was turned out was not yet filed
the extent that others' are suppressed, then saidinto courts thus no resolution or judgment took
freedom is void and no longer grantable.place. The employer, upon knowing of the said
The issue on the right to privacy is often openedallegations, immediately denied the application. Too
up during employment process whereby aunfortunate though for the applicant he did not
background check is conducted. This process isreview that the police reports could have violated
the sole way of knowing the full history of ahis right to privacy and the employer thus abused
person to verify whether or not he is capable ofhis liberty to information.
doing the job affronts him by drawing theThe presented contrasts are just some of the
qualifications and disqualifications that his or hermany mind boggling issues that confront
past reports would generate. Another case to bebackground check, rights, and freedom. But the
considered here is the assumption that suspectsmore that people are being exposed to these
of crimes cannot be liable of any penalty unlesskinds of issues, they are given the chance to
otherwise proven guilty thereby setting theweigh things. Just as how freedom should be
alleged into an immunity of freedom. Thispracticed with responsibility so should rights.
provision of the constitution can also be used inTreatment of information should be always in
drawing justifications on the hiring process.accordance with the law and that even in
Many companies would implement backgroundemployment; background check should not be
checks for employment verification in order to beused to advance discrimination or degradation of a
sure of the people they invest in and put in theirperson but just as a tool to check on the
companies. Just as one CEO chided to confirm thecapacity of a person based on legality and
statement; "With small businesses, every newacceptable facts and not just soluble allegations.
employee is a huge cost to the organization so it's